Posted by David KhaliliFri, 07 Nov 2008 04:47:00 GMT
Image from: www.plateforme-elsa.org
In another addition to my (hopefully) ongoing series of
Clinic Reviews, we are graced
by a review by my senior Parisian Clinic Expert, "Frenchy McFrenchfry." Obviously her name has been changed to protect
her identity, but I am incredibly excited to post her review of what seems to be a fantastic and revolutionary, if
not at times unethical, sexual health clinic in Paris. Please to be enjoy.
I am a fairly straight female, and I went to a clinic in Paris, France. It's a clinic run by the Mouvement Français de Planning Familial
(French Movement for Family Planning), or MFPF. I waited maybe an hour to get in and see the doctor, but not because they were very busy.
A woman came into the waiting room where I was discussing politics with a new waiting-room buddy and welcomed us into a kind of conference
room next door. Once the room was sufficiently filled with nervous-looking French girls, two counselors came in and started asking us what
we knew about contraception, and then they corrected our misconceptions and answered our questions. To my utter astonishment, I learned stuff.
For instance, I had no idea that abortions, if correctly performed, are almost completely harmless to your body, even after your third or
fourth. This is a well-kept secret in the US, apparently. In fact, all the workers at the MFPF were fascinated to hear how all this stuff
works in the Barbarous States of America.
Then came something utterly shocking to me as an Amuhrikan: one of the counselors asked us to disclose private medical information! And many
of the girls complied! Totally illegal back home, if I'm not mistaken, but kind of cool nonetheless because it creates an open environment.
What was not as cool was the actual exam. The doctor was very nice, he would come into the conference every now and then to answer rather
private questions in front of everyone else and to call in the next girl (they weren't exactly strict about appointments, they were like
"who was here first?" and I was like "me," and other girls were like "I have class, can I go first?" and I was like "uh, sure..."). But
once I got in to see him, he seemed to be pretending not to understand my (practically fluent) French, which made giving him the necessary
information very difficult. He was just going to give me my birth control prescription (which I am admittedly dubious about because he
seemed unsure about which French brand to give me) but I had something I wanted him to check out, so he made me undress in a practically
open corner of the room, which I found awkward, and then proceeded to poke and prod without letting me know what he was doing or why.
Then he handed me my pap smear in an envelope and told me to go mail it with a check for 17 euro.
The whole business cost me 22 euro, plus the 17 euro check for the lab, plus the 88 centimes to mail my own pap smear, plus 22.40 for
three months' worth of birth control pills. Hopefully my school insurance will reimburse me. But not shabby, really, even if the experience
was a bit of a culture shock. But here I have to say that the MFPF is pretty amazing, very feminist, very pro contraception, pro giving out
correct information instead of scaring girls into being careful, and anti forced marriage (which is actually a huge problem here). Actually,
a few weeks ago I unwittingly met one of MFPF's founders, and he was very nice.
I'd give this experience a 7 out of 10 for sheer novelty. MFPF is fantastic about contraception, but you should really go to a private practice
if you want anything else done (or are American).
REMINDER: If you would like to write a review of your local sexual health clinic from your perspective, please email me for more information.
Posted by David KhaliliFri, 31 Oct 2008 06:47:00 GMT
As you may have read, two weeks ago I visited the fine San Francisco City Clinic and chronicled my experience
(read here). My main
point with that post was to work against the stigma of going and getting tested. Also to point out that
you shouldn't wait until you see that bump or that goo coming out of your junk to get tested, but to
do your best at going for regular testing. Particularly if you are not in a monogamous relationship but that is
another post all together.
I might as well post my results in interest of self disclosure...I'm clean bitches! I had no worry, but just
like for many other people, getting tested can cause you to have moments of self-doubt.
However, if you find yourself with not so happy results from your recent STD testing and are concerned
about openly telling your past partners, you may consider using an e-card service like
inSPOT. inSPOT is a website that allows you to send anonymous
e-cards to your past sexual partners to let them know that you have an STD and that they might
want to get tested as well. While I prefer honesty, this is better than nothing. Thankfully this site
also offers a list of places that you can get tested based on where you live.
The image above is my favorite, if not only due to its absurd abrasiveness.
Note: I've decided to visit other clinics in San Francisco to review the experience and will post them at a later date. If you are female, FTM,
MTF and/or live outside of San Francisco and would like to write a review of your experience at your local
clinic please contact me, I'd like to post your experience for others to read. You can contact me at
david@omniphilia.com with "Clinic Review" in the subject line.
Posted by David KhaliliSat, 11 Oct 2008 07:39:00 GMT
This is a long post, scroll to bottom for summary
It was time for my routine STD check. After calling a variety of possible clinics I decided upon
SF City Clinic simply because it opened
at 8am, perfectly early enough before work starts. Waking up way to early, I arrived 15 min before the opening. Fuck, there is already 10 people
waiting in line. 10 people as diverse as you can get. Old, young, Black, Latino, Asian, all socio-economic statuses except the uber-wealthy (they have
std checks at home). Right at 8am they let us all file in. Manning the counter is a middle-aged black woman with blonde highlights that match the yellow speckles on her blouse. As we form a line
before the red stripe that "ensures" privacy she calmly says "next," quietly waits for you to walk up and confess to whatever sins you've made. Without a
flinch or change in intonation she asks, "do you have any symptoms? Is this your first time here?" then gives you a number or letter. However, when I
approach I say, "I'm here for a routine check up," without asking if I had been here before she simply gives me number and informational sheet and gives me that look that tells me to walk away. At this
point I'm not sure if it was "better" that I got a number or letter.
We all sit in a DMV-like setting. Some more nervous than others. Some more "anonymous" than others. Number 36 is a tall, skinny, blonde man, he was the
"lucky one," lucky in that he was first in line. They called his number from the front of the room and he follows, only to return moments later.
Five minutes pass, "number 36" is called and he walks back to the front hallway. Again, he returns moments later. Another five minutes and a door open
behind us all, an older black woman in a lab coat soothingly breaks the silence, "good morning, number 36?" I'm reminded of a weird mash-up between the
films Brazil, Hitchhikers Guide, and the opening scene to Joe vs the Volcano. If only Abe Vigoda was here to offer me orange soda
as a gift, if only.
It's difficult to figure out if the jittery guy sitting next to me is nervous because he's symptomatic, had a risky sexual experience that he regrets or
just doesn't like waiting. He lifts the newspaper to his face over and over, stands up, paces, and sits down until his letter his called.
As an unspoken rule, eye contact is forbidden. I tested this theory with a few people. Yep, verbotten.
I try to get figure out similarities between those who got numbers, nothing visible. I guess the letters are reserved for those who are symptomatic.
To the side of the waiting area there's a poorly painted mural of what seems to be a tropical jungle. At the top is a painted flowing banner which
reads "if it's magic why can't it be everlasting?" this can be construed in a multitude of ways, some more encouraging than other.
After waiting 50 min I'm called for the first time. The first time they call your number is to obtain your general information to an older Asian woman
who boarders on sassy and maternal. She tells you to create a password so that you can confidentially check your results online within a week. At the end
she asks if I'd like to make a $10 donation. In my own way I figure this is a way to grease their palms and bump me up the list, getting me seen earlier.
I oblige.
On one of the cubicle walls facing the waiting room is perhaps the most bizarre public health ad campaign posters I've seen. It reads "dogsaretalking.com
-- get tested for syphilis" with a paw print where the o's should be. Accompanied by a picture of a frenchie, dachshund, lab and bulldog, all of puppy age.
A heavy set clinician pops her head out of a door, glasses hanging down her nose. She calls out "42." no answer. "number 42," no answer. She sighs,
"four-two." yep, this reminds me of the mash-up film I mentioned earlier.
30 min after I was first checked in, a doctor calls my number. An incredibly personable physician, with sensitivity, care and a non-chalant attitude she
took my sexual and drug history. Who I've slept with, what sexual acts, how many people, what kind of drugs I've taken and how often.
At which point she would get excited (but not sexually) about a drug I had taken or sexual experience I'd had. She did an incredibly good job at
making me feel like I was talking to a long-time friend about my personal history. She didn't
seem too worried by my history and made a few jokes that weren't canned, but sincere. Handing me a cup and brown bag, she asked me to fill the cup with
my pee-pee as she finished her side of the paper work. As I walked to the restroom, the same heavy set spectacled
physician could be heard sighing "fourTY two!?" I come back and give my doctor my pee cup, she checks my hands for syphilis sores (none), chest for
rashes (none), and my diiiiick for abnormalities (none).
I then wait again, this time for 10 min to get my blood test, not a bad waiting period. My blood was taken by a Puerto Rican version of one of my sweetest aunts.
As she withdrew my blood she spoke to me in a thick accent rattling on about life, giving me tips, telling me to save money and travel. With ease she
finished up her phlebotomist task and accented it with minorly complaining about working for the city.
In Summary
Overall time: 2 hours.
I had an overall positive experience at the
San Francisco City Clinic. However, I came in knowing that I would be spending a lot of time waiting.
The employees ranged from disgruntled city workers to sincere physicians who were excited to work with "the community." Bring a book and expect to
deal with the basic beauracracy. If you are able to go to
Magnet,
Planned Parenthood or any other clinic during the middle of the day, I'm sure it would be worth while.
If you have decent insurance, you might as well take advantage of that and get tested there. However, overall SF City Clinic was not bad at all.
They also have certain hours on Tuesdays and Thursdays if you currently have symptoms.
SF City Clinic www.dph.sf.ca.us
356 7th St
San Francisco, CA 94103
(415) 487-5500
Posted by David KhaliliTue, 03 Jun 2008 05:53:00 GMT
Human Rights Watch (HRW) recently came out with a press release on the five convictions of men for being HIV positive. In total, nine
men have been convicted on "debauchery" charges. These men were interrogated, asked to give names of other men, and medically
examined for receptive anal sex. The HRW has documented that such "medical examinations" constitute torture.
For more information please see the HRW's press release here.
Tonight I went to a talk hosted by the LGBT Center in San Francisco and HRW on the recent convictions
as well as the nature of LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender) rights in Egypt. The panelists included Maher Sabry a film maker and activist,
Mazen who was amongst the men arrested in the infamous Queen Boat Case in Egypt in 2001,
and Scott Long, Director of the LGBT rights program of HRW.
During the talk there was discussion of the recent cases of arrests of HIV-positive men in Egypt, but more so on the Queen Boat case. Not only
was Mazen one of the men arrested in the Queen Boat case, but Maher was the first to break the news internationally by contacting Scott
Long. Recently Maher has just finished his film "All My Life," a narrative based on the Queen Boat case (which is going
to be played at the Frameline Film Festival in San Francisco). Mazen is in the soon to be released
documentary "A Jihad for Love", which is also playing at Frameline.
The night that the men were arrested for being at the Queen Boat, a gay disco in Cairo, Maher began emailing Human Rights organizations around the
world. His only response was by Scott Long, who then persuaded the local Human Rights organizations in Cairo to assist Maher in helping the men arrested.
Mazen was arrested outside of the Queen Boat, he was brought to the local police station and asked to sign a paper that stated that he was Gay and
a bottom (receptive partner in male-male anal sex), when he declined to sign the paper he was beaten. He and the other arrested men were sent to
three locations, including the much dreaded State facility, before their trial. At the third facility they were beaten every day and were never
referred to by their name but as "Faggot #1," "Faggot #2," and so on. Although Mazen was sentenced to 2 years in prison, he was able to flee to
Paris before serving time. You can hear more about his story by seeing the documentary "A Jihad for Love."
It was a pleasure to hear from these men, but I wish that their voices didn't need to be heard because of the atrocities they faced. What Mazen and
Maher are doing shows what is most certainly needed today, a breaking of the silence of what occurs. Not just in countries in the Middle East and not
just towards LGBT individuals.
Side note: I spoke with Scott Long of the HRW and he informed me that a full report will be released on Iranian LGBT issues within the coming weeks.
Posted by David KhaliliSat, 26 Jan 2008 22:26:00 GMT
First off, yea yea, I know, it's been a long time since I've posted. But hey, I'm a working man and I'm busy studying the ways of Sexuality via SF State. I've been focusing on my thesis, hoping to finish it by May.
I have also been writing for Deviant Nation, where recently I interviewed the spectacular Crispin Glover as well as co-wrote an article on Sex Drive with the lovely Aradia, model extraordinaire of Deviant Nation and all-knowing in the field of biological and physiological aspects of sexuality.
So read up my lovelies.
____________________________________________
As I've posted before, the French are pretty adept at making striking, cute, poignant or intense AIDS awareness advertisements.
I wanted to share with you their latest ad entitled "Le Poison." Unfortunately I cannot embed it in this blog. The ad starts with multiple seductive shots of gorgeous bodies writhing and undulating against each other, but as the camera pulls back it reveals something else that comes with sex.
Is this effective? What sort of emotions come up for you as you watch this? Is this sex-positive or sex-nagative? Is it just realistic (sans hourglass)? Is it a clever reference to American soap opera Days of Our Lives?
______________________________________________
I'd like to thank the great Slam Johnson for fixing the woes of the server that were afflicting this blog.
Posted by David KhaliliWed, 16 May 2007 12:40:46 GMT
Below are two animated advertisements from France promoting AIDS awareness. The first is the straight version and the second is the gay version. The sex scenes are...well, epic, I must say.
The French have always had a pretty unique/awesome approach at HIV/AIDS awareness.
Posted by David KhaliliTue, 08 May 2007 16:51:00 GMT
Bill Clinton today announced a new deal with pharmo companies to release
once-a-day anti-retrovirals (AIDS Drugs) only costing the patient $1 a day. These meds are the second-line of defense after AIDS patients become resistant to the first round of treatments.
For too long anti-retrovirals were incredibly costly, as well overwhelming. Some would take 14 pills a day.
My skeptical side is worried that because these meds are much less expensive than before, that they will be much less effective. However, the organizations associated with the Clinton Foundation has a good track record.
Anyone know more about this deal or these organizations?
An HIV pos man who knowingly attempted to infect over 130 men (whilst videotaping them) was sentenced to life in prison today. Furthermore, he attempted to seduce a 15-year-old boy into sexual acts.
Of course this is an incredibly horrible thing to do, however, could an argument be made that the 130 men were equally responsible (save for cases of rape, of course) for ensuring the use of safe sex techniques?
Posted by David KhaliliTue, 01 May 2007 19:43:39 GMT
A recent article from the Journal of Sexually Transmitted
Infections reported that 1 in 3 HIV + men in the UK
have unprotected sex. These findings were based on a survery
from 2640 volunteers, and 2311 of them agreed to provide
samples of their saliva for HIV testing. This resulted in
the finding that Brighton, England has a 14% infection rate.
Furthermore, it was found that one in five HIV negative men
in the UK have unprotected sex.
Sure this is scary, how does this effect everyone? What
does this mean about the billions of dollars in HIV
awareness? Other studies have shown that even though a person
may know about safer sex practices, this doesn't necessarily
mean they will utilize those techniques.
After the 80's and most of the 90's, peoples
attention to HIV has dwindled. While everyone knows there
is still a risk of contracting HIV, it does not feel like
as much of a death sentence anymore. The discussion of
HIV is also not as prevelant as it used to be.
However, if you check closely, the report shows that
HIV pos men are having unprotected sex with other HIV pos
men. Which leads me to think about the numerous dating websites
out at the moment where you can search for people
who have the same STD as you do. Is this creating more
of the "other" in our society? Or is this simply pragmatic?